← Back to blog Construction

HSE Prosecution for Paperwork Failures: What Small Builders Need to Know

7 April 2026 · 9 min read

Construction is the most dangerous industry in the UK. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) knows this, and it enforces accordingly. In the year ending March 2025, construction accounted for 25% of all fatal injuries to workers in Great Britain, despite employing only 5% of the workforce. The HSE prosecutes aggressively, and the Sentencing Council guidelines introduced in 2016 dramatically increased the penalties.

But here is what many small builders do not realise: a significant proportion of HSE prosecutions are not triggered by accidents. They are triggered by documentation failures discovered during routine inspections or investigations into near misses.

£150M+
Total fines issued by HSE in 2024/25. Average fine for small construction firms (turnover under 2M): 12,000 to 45,000. Larger firms: 100,000 to multi-million.

What counts as a paperwork failure

The HSE does not use the term "paperwork failure." They prosecute under specific regulations, most commonly the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015). But the underlying breach is often the absence, inadequacy, or out-of-date status of documents that the law requires you to maintain.

Risk assessments and method statements (RAMS)

Under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, every employer must conduct a suitable and sufficient assessment of the risks to their employees and anyone affected by their work. In construction, this means a risk assessment and method statement for every significant activity on every site. No RAMS, or RAMS that are generic and not site-specific, is one of the most common findings in HSE inspections.

A RAMS that says "work at height: use appropriate fall protection" is not a risk assessment. A RAMS that says "work at height on the rear dormer: scaffold erected by [named company] to NASC TG20, scaff tag checked daily by site supervisor, edge protection to all open edges, toe boards minimum 150mm, workers hold PASMA/IPAF as appropriate, harness required above 6m on gable end" is a risk assessment.

COSHH assessments

The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 require assessments for every hazardous substance used on site. For a typical construction project, that includes cement dust, adhesives, sealants, wood dust, paints, solvents, and cleaning chemicals. Each substance needs a specific assessment that references the manufacturer's safety data sheet and documents the control measures in use.

Many small builders have COSHH assessments from when they first set up the business. If those assessments reference products you no longer use, or do not include products you have started using, they are out of date and non-compliant.

Toolbox talk records

CDM 2015 requires principal contractors to provide suitable site inductions and ongoing information, instruction, and training. Toolbox talks are the standard mechanism. The HSE expects to see records of what topics were covered, when, who attended, and who delivered the talk. No records means no evidence of compliance, regardless of whether the talks actually happened.

CDM documentation

CDM 2015 imposes specific documentation duties on clients, designers, principal designers, and principal contractors. For projects with more than one contractor (which is most projects), the principal contractor must maintain:

The construction phase plan is mandatory before work begins. Starting work without one is an offence. An inadequate plan that does not address site-specific risks is treated the same as no plan.

Real prosecution examples

Roofing contractor, West Midlands, 2024 Fined 28,000 plus 7,000 costs after an HSE inspector found workers on a roof with no edge protection, no harnesses, and no RAMS for the work at height activity. No accident occurred. The prosecution was for the documentation and safety management failure alone.
Demolition firm, Greater Manchester, 2024 Fined 63,000 after an investigation found no construction phase plan, no COSHH assessments for asbestos-containing materials (despite surveys identifying ACMs on site), and no records of site inductions. Triggered by a near miss reported by a neighbouring business.
Small housebuilder, Hampshire, 2023 Fined 14,000 for failure to maintain adequate welfare facilities documentation and inadequate RAMS for excavation work. The excavation trench was correctly shored, but the RAMS referenced a different site. The HSE treated the generic documentation as equivalent to no documentation.

CDM 2015 requirements in plain English

CDM 2015 applies to all construction projects in Great Britain. For small builders, the key duties are:

  1. If you employ workers or subcontractors: you are a contractor under CDM 2015. You must plan, manage, and monitor your own work. You must ensure workers are competent, supervised, and informed about risks. You must cooperate with other contractors and the principal contractor.
  2. If you are the only contractor on a domestic project: CDM 2015 still applies, but the duties are simpler. You must still manage risks, provide welfare facilities, and maintain competence records.
  3. If you control a site with more than one contractor: you are likely the principal contractor. You must produce a construction phase plan, manage site rules, coordinate health and safety, and maintain the health and safety file.
  4. Whatever your role: you need risk assessments, method statements, COSHH assessments, training records, site induction records, and toolbox talk records. These must be site-specific, current, and accessible on site.

The sentencing guidelines

The Sentencing Council's definitive guideline for health and safety offences (effective February 2016) transformed the financial risk. Before 2016, construction firms might receive fines of 5,000 to 20,000 for documentation offences. After 2016, the same offences attract significantly higher penalties because fines are now calibrated to turnover:

The court considers aggravating factors: previous convictions, failing to heed advice from the HSE, cost-cutting motivation, and obstruction. For a small builder with a turnover of 500,000, a single prosecution for inadequate RAMS and missing COSHH assessments can result in a fine that wipes out an entire year's profit.

What you actually need on every site

This is a significant documentation burden for a small business. Most builders manage it with lever-arch files in the site cabin, Word document templates, and a filing system that depends on one person's memory. That system works until the HSE arrives unannounced and asks for the COSHH assessment for the adhesive being used on the ground floor.

SitePad handles the site documentation the HSE checks

RAMS, COSHH assessments, toolbox talks, site inductions, training records, and inspection logs. Site-specific, version-controlled, and accessible on any device.

Learn more about SitePad
Slatewick

Compliance tools for regulated industries. Built with the tools of tomorrow, guided by the values of yesterday.

Resources
Blog Compliance Guides
Legal
Privacy Policy Terms of Service Cookie Policy Acceptable Use
Contact
hello@slatewick.co.uk Kronaxis Limited Registered in England and Wales
© 2026 Slatewick. All rights reserved. AI-generated content requires professional review before use.